PAL10872 (aspect retio not conform with specifications). Add picture for aspect ratio...

[modules/smesh.git] / doc / salome / gui / SMESH / aspect_ratio_3d.htm

diff --git a/doc/salome/gui/SMESH/aspect_ratio_3d.htm b/doc/salome/gui/SMESH/aspect_ratio_3d.htm
index 560b78509260ab2e5d63daaf51290cebd5d5017a..20573a1fdf15a29216192b9fcdb9e15e3bdfaa3e 100755 (executable)
--- a/doc/salome/gui/SMESH/aspect_ratio_3d.htm
+++ b/doc/salome/gui/SMESH/aspect_ratio_3d.htm
@@ -97,29 +97,13 @@ else
 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
 <p><img src="i_blue.jpg" x-maintain-ratio="TRUE" width="30px" height="30px" border="0" class="img_whs2">This mesh quality criterion resembles to the Aspect ratio \r
 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
 <p><img src="i_blue.jpg" x-maintain-ratio="TRUE" width="30px" height="30px" border="0" class="img_whs2">This mesh quality criterion resembles to the Aspect ratio \r

- criterion, however, it is also applied to 3D mesh elements: tetrahedrons, \r
+ criterion, however, it is applied to 3D mesh elements: tetrahedrons, \r

  pentahedrons, hexahedrons, etc. &nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
  pentahedrons, hexahedrons, etc. &nbsp;</p>\r
 \r

-<p>There are 2 simple formulas to evaluate directly the value of quality \r
- Qk for simplex in 2D and 3D. The formulas are :</p>\r
+<p>There are simple formulas to evaluate directly the value of quality \r
+ Qk for simplex in 3D. The formulas are :</p>\r

 \r
 \r

-<p>\95 For triangle :</p>\r
-\r
-<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
-\r
-<p><img src="image21.gif" width="158px" height="110px" border="0" class="img_whs3"></p>\r
-\r
-<p><img src="image23.gif" width="120px" height="48px" border="0" class="img_whs4"></p>\r
-\r
-<p>where :</p>\r
-\r
-<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
-\r
-<p><img src="image27.gif" width="234px" height="96px" border="0" class="img_whs5"></p>\r
-\r
-<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
-\r
-<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
+<br>\r

 \r
 <p>\95 For tetrahedron :</p>\r
 \r
 \r
 <p>\95 For tetrahedron :</p>\r
 \r


@@ -136,7 +120,7 @@ else
 \r
 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
 \r
 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r

-<p>For the other types of element like quadrangle, pentahedron and hexahedron \r
+<p>For the other types of element like pentahedron and hexahedron \r

  the formula is the following :</p>\r
 \r
 <p><img src="image30.gif" width="89px" height="32px" border="0" class="img_whs9"> </p>\r
  the formula is the following :</p>\r
 \r
 <p><img src="image30.gif" width="89px" height="32px" border="0" class="img_whs9"> </p>\r


@@ -144,6 +128,17 @@ else
 <p>Where Qi are the quality of all the possible simplex (of same dimension \r
  as the element) that compose the element.</p>\r
 \r
 <p>Where Qi are the quality of all the possible simplex (of same dimension \r
  as the element) that compose the element.</p>\r
 \r

+<p>For example, hexahedron is analysed via 6 tetrahedrons this way:</p>\r
+\r
+<p><img src="image139.gif" border="0" class="img_whs10"> </p>\r
+\r
+<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
+\r
+<p>For 3D elements with quadrangular faces, aspect ratio of such faces\r
+is also analysed and the maximal one over 3D and 2D qualities is taken.</p>\r
+\r
+<p>&nbsp;</p>\r
+\r

 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
 <p class="whs10"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><B>See Also</B></span> \r
 <p>&nbsp;</p>\r
 \r
 <p class="whs10"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><B>See Also</B></span> \r