# -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*-
-# Copyright (C) 2007-2019 CEA/DEN, EDF R&D
+# Copyright (C) 2007-2020 CEA/DEN, EDF R&D
#
# This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
from MEDLoader import *
import unittest
from math import pi,e,sqrt
+from MEDLoaderDataForTest import WriteInTmpDir
class MEDLoaderTest4(unittest.TestCase):
"""
Test series to emulate the future MEDReader plugin for PARAVIS.
"""
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test1(self):
"""
This test is the most simple one. One time serie of one field with only cell fields with no profiles.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test2(self):
"""
One time serie of one field with cell and node discretization in the same field with no profiles.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test3(self):
""" This test is more advanced a same field is defined on CELLS for time steps 0, 2 and 4, and on NODES for time steps 1 and 3.
So two time step series on the same field. No profile here neither on cells nor on nodes.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test4(self):
""" This test defines 3 fields on nodes on the same mesh. All of these fields have no profile.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test5(self):
""" This test plays with profiles both cell profiles and node profiles. Two first fields (resp on cells and on nodes) lie on the same mesh support whereas the third
mesh lies on a different mesh.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test6(self):
""" This test plays with cartesian mesh and profiles. When a sub cartesian mesh can also be considered as a cartesian mesh it is done.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test7(self):
""" This test plays with curvilinear mesh and profiles. When a sub curvilinear mesh can also be considered as a cartesian mesh it is done.
This test is very similar to the test6.
a0Exp.setInfoOnComponents(["XX [m]","YYY [km]"])
m.setCoords(a0Exp)
mm=MEDFileCurveLinearMesh() ; mm.setMesh(m)
+ self.assertEqual(mm.getSpaceDimension(), m.getSpaceDimension())
fam=DataArrayInt(8) ; fam.iota(0) ; mm.setFamilyFieldArr(0,fam) ; del fam
num=DataArrayInt(8) ; num.iota(100) ; mm.setRenumFieldArr(0,num) ; del num
#
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test8(self):
""" This test plays with with gauss fields with no profiles.
"""
#
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test9(self):
""" This test plays with with gauss fields with profiles.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test10(self):
""" This test plays with fields only on nodes containing profiles.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test11(self):
""" This test is the ultimate test for the profiles with gauss points. It tests that even if there is non contiguous parts in definition of gauss points, it works !
WARNING here, as no other discretizations exists, the priority is given to the field -> the mesh is renumbered to accelerate the build of array of field.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test12(self):
""" This test is the second ultimate test for the profiles with gauss points.
This test is close to test11 but here a 2nd field on cells without profile. So here the mesh is expected to be the same than m.
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test13(self):
""" Testing polyhedrons mixed with hexa8"""
fname="ForMEDReader13.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test14(self):
""" Testing only polyhedrons"""
fname="ForMEDReader14.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test15(self):
"""
"ForMEDReader15.med" file has a spaceDim 3 mesh "mesh" (it is important !)
self.assertTrue(mml2.retrieveGlobalNodeIdsIfAny() is None)
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test16(self):
""" Here 2 meshes "mesh1" and "mesh2" and 4 fields (no profiles here) :
- "zeField1_0" (CELLS) and "zeField2_0" (NODES) on "mesh1"
self.assertEqual(len(allFMTSLeavesPerCommonSupport2[0][0]),2)
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test17(self):
""" First test on GAUSS_NE (Elno). Here no Profiles.
2 times steps.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test18(self):
""" First test on GAUSS_PT. Here no Profiles. 2 times steps.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test19(self):
"""
This test is a simple non profile CELL field but lying on cells of dimension -1 (not 0 as "usual").
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test20(self):
""" This test works with groups/families on cells AND on nodes. Here 4 fields each on same time steps (2).
1 field on CELLS without profile, 1 field on CELLS with profile, 1 field on NODES without profile, 1 field on NODES with profile.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test21(self):
""" Here the created MED file contains only a mesh. The aim here is to test capability of MEDReader to support no fields.
This test checks nothing but write a MED file to be used by MEDReader tests.
mm.write(fname,2)
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test22(self):
""" Use case where a field on nodes (ANodeField) on a mesh defined both in meshdim 2 and meshdim 1.
The only possible geometrical support that suits the field is those with meshdim equal to 1 (-1 in relative).
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test23(self):
""" Non regression test 2219 of modes. Idem than test22 except that here the node field is on profile.
"""
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test24(self):
""" Non regression test for cartesian mesh whose the 3rd direction has only one node. It a false 3D mesh.
"""
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test25(self):
""" A tricky test that reproduces an invalid behaviour
Here a same field is defined both on CELLS and GAUSS_PT, with a profile for each.
del fff0
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test26(self):
""" Test focused on field on nodes (here f0Node and f1Node) lying on a profile of nodes that do not match perfectly a sub set of cells of its underlying mesh. See bug EDF 2405 and 2177.
For this type of fields the support will contain only vertices.
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12)) # <- THE test is here !!!
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test27(self):
""" This test defines 2 fields f0 and f1 on nodes lying on an unstructured mesh with no cells.
f0 is a field on all nodes. f1 is a partial field on nodes.
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test28(self):
""" This test defines 2 fields f0,f1,f2,f3 lying on an unstructured mesh with cells including NORM_POINT1.
Both f0 and f1 are on NODES and f2 and f3 are on cells. f1 and f2 share the same support.
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test29(self):
""" This test focused on HEXA27 cell for which the MED numbering is not equal to the VTK numbering. So here the HEXA27 cell is those in MED file documentation (reference element).
"""
ffGauss=allFMTSLeavesPerCommonSupport1[0][0][1][0]
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test30(self):
""" This test is focused on cartesian meshes. Here the cartesian mesh "CartMesh" has a field on HEXA8 (FieldOnCells) and a field on QUAD4 (FieldOnFaces).
So the first one (FieldOnCells) lies on a cartesian mesh whereas the second one lies on unstructured one.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test31(self):
"""non regression test of EDF 7972"""
fname="ForMEDReader31.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test32(self):
""" This test is close to test30 except that here the profiles on dim-1 of structured mesh is considered here."""
fname="ForMEDReader32.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test33(self):
"""Non regression test concerning polygons. Thanks Adrien. This bug can't be shown by simply reading an displaying a MED file containing only polygons. A filter must be applied on it to show it. The a2 array was responsible of that bug."""
fname="ForMEDReader33.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test34(self):
""" This test is the thirs ultimate test (base on test12) for the profiles with gauss points.
This test highlight the hidden imp linked to bug #8655.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test35(self):
""" Emulate MEDReader in // mode context. Here a Simple mesh having more nodes than really needed. This test focuses on that point particularly."""
fname="ForMEDReader35.med"
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(vExp,1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test36(self):
"""Bug EDF11027. Here mesh at level 0 (TRI3) does not fetch all the nodes. Level -1 (SEG2) does not fetch all the nodes neither. But all TRI3 + all SEG2 fetch all nodes.
aaa field on GAUSSPoints lying only on TRI3 share the same support than profile node field ccc.
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test37(self):
""" Introduction of non cartesian meshes management. Here cylindrical."""
fname="ForMEDReader37.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test38(self):
""" Introduction of non cartesian meshes management. Here spherical."""
fname="ForMEDReader38.med"
pass
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test39(self):
"""Idem test37, test38, test39, test40 except that here it is an unstructured mesh."""
fname="ForMEDReader39.med"
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(DataArrayDouble([0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3]),1e-14))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test40(self):
"""Idem test37, test38, test39, test40 except that here it is a CL mesh."""
fname="ForMEDReader40.med"
self.assertTrue(v.isEqual(DataArrayDouble([0.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.9,1.0,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9,2.0,2.1,2.2,2.3]),1e-14))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test41(self):
"""This test focused on bug revealed with // load of multi nodes field with no profile. The error was the first node field (dataarray partdef) change the partdef for the others ! """
fname="ForMEDReader41.med"
assert(v1.isEqual(DataArrayDouble([101,102,103,104,106,107,108,109,111,112,113,114,116,117,118,119,121,122,123,124]),1e-12))
pass
+ @WriteInTmpDir
def test42(self):
""" EDF14869 - SEG4 """
fname="ForMEDReader42.med"
